Making a False Charge of an Offence Under the BNS (Section 248): IPC 211 Mapping (2026)

Published on: October 9, 2026
Last updated: 10 July 2026

What Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita covers, the old Indian Penal Code section it replaced, and the punishment for making a false criminal charge with intent to injure. Last verified October 2026.

Explainer · New Criminal Code · BNS

Someone files a false complaint against you to settle a score. A property dispute turns into a fabricated criminal case. A relative lodges a charge that both sides know is baseless, only to cause harm. The person who is falsely accused suffers arrest, cost, and loss of name, even when the case later collapses. Indian law treats the act of making a false criminal charge as a serious offence. Under the new criminal code, it is Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which replaced Section 211 of the old Indian Penal Code. This explainer sets out what the section covers, the exact old to new mapping, the punishment, and the key change from the old law. Last verified October 2026.

The short answer
  • What it is: making a false criminal charge with intent to injure, under Section 248 of the BNS, 2023.
  • Old law: it replaces Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
  • Punishment: ordinary charge, up to 5 years or fine up to Rs 2 lakh or both; serious charge, up to 10 years and fine.
  • Main change: punishment increased from the old 2 year and 7 year ceilings to 5 years and 10 years, with a fixed fine ceiling.
  • Key limit: a failed case is not a false case. Knowledge and intent to injure must be shown.

01The problem: a weaponised complaint

A false criminal case is a powerful weapon. The person who starts it may never intend to prove anything. The aim is to cause arrest, expense, and harm to reputation. By the time the case is thrown out, the damage is done.

The law answers this in two ways. The person wrongly accused can defend the false case, and the law also treats the making of the false charge as a crime by itself. The second answer is Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. It is aimed at the person who sets the law in motion dishonestly, knowing there is no lawful ground.

This offence is part of the group that protects the system of public justice. It keeps the machinery of the courts and the police from being used as a tool of private revenge.

02What Section 248 says

Section 248 of the BNS punishes a person who, with intent to injure another, institutes or causes to be instituted a criminal proceeding against that person, or falsely charges that person with an offence, knowing that there is no just or lawful ground for the proceeding or charge.

The punishment has two levels.

  • Ordinary false charge: imprisonment of either description up to five years, or a fine up to two lakh rupees, or both.
  • Serious false charge: if the false proceeding or charge was for an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for ten years or more, the punishment is imprisonment up to ten years and a fine.

Classification

The gravity of this offence changes with the level of the false charge, and so can its classification as cognizable or bailable. Read the current First Schedule of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for the status that applies to your facts.

03Old to new: IPC 211 to BNS 248

Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, is now Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The idea is the same, but the punishment is heavier.

PointOld law (IPC 211)New law (BNS 248)
Section numberSection 211Section 248
Ordinary false chargeImprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or bothImprisonment up to 5 years, or fine up to Rs 2 lakh, or both
Serious false charge (death, life, or 10 years or more)Imprisonment up to 7 years and fineImprisonment up to 10 years and fine

The substantive change is clear. The ordinary limb rose from a two year ceiling to five years, and the Act now fixes a maximum fine of two lakh rupees. The serious limb rose from seven years to ten years. The new code treats a false criminal charge as more serious than the old law did.

04The ingredients of the offence

A conviction under Section 248 needs more than a case that failed. Each of these must be shown.

  • A criminal proceeding or a charge. The accused must have started a criminal proceeding, or falsely charged a person with an offence.
  • Falsity. The charge or proceeding must be false, meaning there was no just or lawful ground for it.
  • Knowledge. The person must have known there was no just or lawful ground. An honest but mistaken complaint is not covered.
  • Intent to injure. The act must be done with intent to cause injury to the person charged.
Section 248 does not punish a failed case. It punishes a false one, made knowingly and to cause harm.

05Not the same as acquittal

This is the point most often misunderstood. The fact that a person was acquitted, or that a complaint did not succeed, does not by itself prove a false charge. Many genuine cases fail for want of proof.

To attract Section 248, there must be material to show that the complainant knew there was no lawful ground and acted to injure. Courts are careful here, because the opposite rule would stop honest people from reporting crime for fear of a counter case. The threshold of knowledge and intent is what separates a false charge from an honest complaint that did not hold up.

06Practical points

  • Keep the record of the false case. The orders, the final result, and any finding of the court about the nature of the complaint are the backbone of a Section 248 case.
  • Show knowledge and intent, not just failure. Gather material that the complainant knew the charge was baseless and acted to harm.
  • Mind the procedure for court-related offences. Offences that concern proceedings in a court often need a specific route to launch a prosecution. Check the correct procedure before you file.
  • Consider the civil side too. A false case can also support a civil action for malicious prosecution, which is a separate remedy.
  • Read the current text. The classification and procedure can change, so check the section and the First Schedule on the day you advise or file.

For related offences against public justice, see fabricating and using false evidence and causing disappearance of evidence or screening an offender.

07Where Claw fits

Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals.

A Section 248 matter, whether you are meeting a false charge or building one, rests on how courts have separated a false prosecution from an honest case that simply failed. Claw lets you search more than 30 crore judgments, from the Supreme Court since 1950 and the High Courts since 1990, with results in under five seconds, so you can see how the knowledge and intent threshold has been read. It also tracks the live side, the cases, orders and hearings across 9,102 courts, benches and forums, searchable by party name or advocate name. Claw does not use customer case documents to train AI models.

Start a free Claw account to look up false-charge precedent and follow your own matter by party or advocate name. For the wider search, see our hub on case search across Indian courts.

08Sources and further reading

This explainer is general information, not legal advice. The BNS can be amended and courts interpret it over time, so check the current text and take advice from counsel before you act.

09Frequently asked questions

What is Section 248 of the BNS?

Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 punishes a person who, with intent to injure, starts a criminal proceeding or falsely charges a person with an offence, knowing there is no just or lawful ground. It is the new-code version of Section 211 of the old Indian Penal Code.

Which IPC section does BNS 248 replace?

It replaces Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The core offence is the same, but the punishment is heavier. The ordinary limb rose from up to two years to up to five years, and the serious limb rose from up to seven years to up to ten years.

What is the punishment for a false charge under BNS 248?

For an ordinary false charge, imprisonment up to five years, or a fine up to two lakh rupees, or both. If the false charge was of an offence punishable with death, life imprisonment, or ten years or more, the punishment is imprisonment up to ten years and a fine.

Does an acquittal mean the complaint was a false charge?

No. Many genuine cases fail for want of proof. To attract Section 248 there must be material showing the complainant knew there was no lawful ground and acted to injure. Knowledge and intent, not just failure, are what matter.

Can a false FIR lead to a case under Section 248?

It can, where the person who lodged it knew there was no just or lawful ground and acted with intent to injure. The final result of the false case and any court finding about its nature are important evidence. Specific procedures may apply where the false charge was made in a court proceeding.

Can I search and track false charge cases on Claw?

Yes. Claw searches more than 30 crore judgments in under five seconds, so you can find how courts treated a false charge under Section 248 and the old IPC 211, and it tracks cases, orders and hearings by party or advocate name across 9,102 courts, benches and forums. It helps you find and follow cases, but does not give legal advice.

Explore CLAW

The tools behind the guides

CLAW helps Indian advocates and firms manage cases, track courts and research the law.