Claw vs Peshi
Peshi is a free app that tracks your hearings and cause lists. Claw is an all-in-one platform with judgement search, case management, and compliance built in. Here is how they actually differ.
Comparison · Claw vs Peshi
Every advocate has felt the small dread of forgetting a tareekh, or scrambling to check the cause list before a hearing. Some tools exist just to solve that one problem well. Others try to cover the whole job of running a legal practice: tracking hearings, searching case law, managing files, and staying compliant. This page compares Peshi, a free hearing and cause-list tracker, with Claw, an all-in-one legaltech platform, so you can pick based on what you actually need.
- Peshi: a free, focused mobile app for Indian advocates to track their own hearings, cause lists, and client reminders.
- Claw: an all-in-one AI platform adding judgement search across 30 crore judgements, case tracking across 8200+ courts, and compliance automation.
- Pick Peshi if: you only need free, simple hearing tracking for yourself.
- Pick Claw if: you also need case-law search, wider court coverage, or compliance and reporting for a practice or firm.
01The problem: tracking hearings vs running a practice
Missing a hearing date, or turning up to court without knowing what happened last time, is a real risk for any advocate. That is a narrow, sharp problem, and it deserves a tool that solves it without fuss.
The narrow problem: not missing a tareekh
A solo advocate or a small practice often just needs a clean, reliable way to see today’s hearings, what the judge said last time, and the next date, ideally with a reminder sent automatically to the client. This does not need AI, judgement search, or billing. It needs to be simple and dependable.
The wider problem: running an entire practice or firm
As soon as a practice grows, or a firm or in-house legal team is involved, the job gets bigger. Tracking hearings is still part of it, but so is searching case law to build an argument, keeping a record of case documents, watching court orders for compliance deadlines, and reporting on caseload to partners or clients. A tool built only for cause lists cannot do this on its own.
Case tracking for something specific, like a cheque bounce matter, has its own rhythm too. See what Section 138 case tracking involves if that is the kind of matter you are managing.
These are different scopes, not a strict ranking
Peshi and Claw are not built for exactly the same job. Peshi is a focused hearing tracker. Claw is a broader platform that includes hearing and case tracking as one part of a larger toolkit. This page compares them honestly on that basis.
02What to look at before choosing
Before picking a tool, it helps to be clear on what you actually need it to do.
- Scope of the job: do you only need to track your own hearings and cause lists, or do you also need case-law search, document storage, and compliance tracking?
- Coverage: which courts and case types does the tool actually track, and how current is that data?
- Reminders and alerts: does it notify you and your clients automatically, and through which channels?
- Room to grow: if your practice grows, or you join a firm, will the tool grow with you, or will you need to switch to something bigger later?
- Cost: what do you pay, and what do you get for it?
A free app that only tracks hearings and an all-in-one platform that also searches case law and manages compliance are solving different-sized problems. The right choice depends on which problem you actually have.
03Peshi and Claw, compared
Here is what each tool is actually built to do, described fairly.
Peshi
A free, mobile-first app for Indian advocates to track hearings, cause lists, and client reminders.
Strengths
- Simple, focused hearing dashboard organised around today’s, upcoming, and past matters, so the next date is easy to find.
- Automated WhatsApp and SMS reminders to clients, which saves manual follow-up.
- Case lifecycle tracking (draft, active, disposed, archived) and a searchable client directory.
- Free to start, with a simple, privacy-conscious, mobile-first design that is easy to pick up.
Keep in mind
- Built for tracking your own hearings and cases, not for searching case law or judgements.
- No case management beyond hearing tracking, so document storage, compliance automation, and reporting are outside its scope.
- Designed mainly for individual advocates rather than firm-wide or corporate legal team use.
Best for A solo advocate or small practice that just wants a free, simple way to never miss a hearing.
Top pick
Claw
An all-in-one legaltech platform combining case search, an AI legal assistant, case management, and compliance automation.
Strengths
- Case tracking across 8200 plus courts, including all states, tribunals, district courts, and the Supreme Court, with auto case updates and cause lists.
- AI-based judgement search across 30 crore judgements, covering 25 High Courts (1980 to 2026) and the Supreme Court (1950 to 2026), with results in under 5 seconds.
- WhatsApp and email alerts, calendar sync, AI auto-compliance that reads a court order and schedules the reminders itself, plus MIS reports and Claw Notebooks.
- One platform for hearing tracking, case research, and practice management, useful as a practice grows or works across a firm or legal team.
Keep in mind
- Being all-in-one means there is more to explore than a single-purpose app like Peshi, so a first-time user may take a little longer to get familiar with everything on offer.
Best for An advocate, law firm, or corporate legal team that wants hearing tracking, judgement search, and compliance in one place.
04Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Peshi | Claw |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Track hearings and cause lists | All-in-one: case search + case management + compliance |
| Court/case coverage | Tracks the advocate’s own added cases | 8200+ courts incl. states, tribunals, district courts, Supreme Court |
| Judgement / case-law search | Not offered | Yes, AI-based, 30 crore judgements, 25 High Courts + Supreme Court |
| Client reminders | WhatsApp and SMS | WhatsApp and email alerts, calendar sync |
| Compliance automation | Not offered | AI auto-compliance reads court orders and schedules reminders |
| Reporting | Basic case lifecycle status | MIS reports, Claw Notebooks |
| AI legal assistant | Not offered | Yes, Legal GPT |
| Built for | Individual advocates | Advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams |
| Pricing | Free to start | Contact for current plan pricing |
05How to choose
The honest answer depends on how big the job is that you are trying to solve.
If all you need is to stop missing hearings, and you do not need case-law search or wider practice management, Peshi is a free, focused tool that does that one job simply. If you also need to search judgements, track cases across a much wider set of courts, manage compliance deadlines from court orders, or report on caseload, a single-purpose hearing tracker will not be enough on its own, and an all-in-one platform like Claw covers more of the job without adding a second tool. If you are choosing based on NJDG-style, court-data-driven case tracking specifically, see our roundup of the best NJDG case tracking tools in India. And if your search needs lean more towards case-law research tools generally, our guide to Indian Kanoon alternatives is a useful next read.
06Where Claw fits
Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals. It is positioned as India’s first all-in-one legaltech platform of this kind.
Against Peshi specifically, Claw is not trying to be a smaller, simpler app. It is built for advocates and firms whose job goes beyond tracking their own hearings: case tracking spans 8200 plus courts including tribunals and district courts, case search covers 30 crore judgements across 25 High Courts and the Supreme Court with verified, court-ready citations, and AI auto-compliance turns a court order directly into scheduled reminders. For a practice that has outgrown a single-purpose tracker, or a firm that needs everyone working from one system, that breadth is the difference. For a solo advocate who only wants free, simple cause-list tracking, Peshi remains a genuinely good fit for that narrower job.
07Sources and further reading
The tools discussed here, linked to their official sources:
- Peshi: peshi.app
- Claw: clawlaw.in
- eCourts Services (official cause lists): services.ecourts.gov.in
- Supreme Court of India (official cause list and judgments): sci.gov.in
This is not an exhaustive list of vendors. Features and pricing should be confirmed with each vendor before you decide.
08Frequently asked questions
Is Peshi the same kind of tool as Claw?
Not exactly. Peshi is a free, focused app for tracking an advocate’s own hearings and cause lists. Claw is a broader all-in-one legaltech platform that includes hearing and case tracking alongside judgement search, case management, and compliance automation. They overlap on hearing tracking but differ in scope.
Does Peshi offer judgement or case-law search?
No. Peshi is built around tracking hearings, cause lists, and client reminders for cases the advocate has added. It does not offer case-law or judgement search. Claw includes AI-based judgement search across 30 crore judgements, covering 25 High Courts and the Supreme Court.
Is Peshi free?
Peshi is positioned as free to start, with its core hearing-tracking features available without a paid plan. Confirm current pricing and plan details directly with Peshi, as this can change.
Which courts does Claw track cases across, compared to Peshi?
Claw tracks cases across 8200 plus courts in India, including all states, tribunals, district courts, and the Supreme Court, with auto case updates and cause lists. Peshi tracks the cases an advocate adds themselves, rather than offering that scale of court coverage as a database.
Can a solo advocate use Claw instead of Peshi?
Yes. Claw covers hearing and cause-list tracking as part of its case management, so a solo advocate can use it for that alone. The difference is that Claw also offers judgement search, compliance automation, and reporting, which a solo advocate may or may not need yet.
What is the main reason to pick Claw over Peshi?
The main reason is scope. If tracking your own hearings is the only problem you have, Peshi solves it simply and for free. If you also need to search case law, track cases across many more courts, or automate compliance from court orders, Claw covers all of that in one platform instead of requiring separate tools.