Claw vs Karza (Perfios) for Litigation and KYB Data

Comparison · Litigation Data & KYB

Updated for 2026 · Claw Editorial

If you searched for a "Karza litigation check" alternative, you are probably trying to do one of two different things, and mixing them up wastes time. One job is a background check: does this person, company, or director have a litigation history, checked quickly and in bulk as part of onboarding or credit risk. The other job is legal case work: actually finding a judgment, reading it, citing it correctly, tracking a hearing, or managing a live matter. Karza, now sold under the Perfios brand, is built for the first job. Claw is built for the second. This page explains both, honestly, so you pick the right one.

01Two different jobs, one confusing search term

"Karza litigation check" is a well-known search term in Indian fintech and compliance circles, but it points to something narrower than most people expect. Karza Technologies was a Mumbai-based data-aggregation company, acquired by Perfios Software Solutions in 2022, and its litigation search is now sold under the Perfios brand as the Legal Search Report, confirmed directly on perfios.ai/legal-search-report (retrieved 17 September 2026). The old "Karza" name still gets searched constantly, which is why this comparison starts there.

The job Karza (Perfios) does: background verification at scale

Karza is not a legal research tool. It is a data platform built for banks, NBFCs, lenders, and onboarding teams who need to run a fast, automated check on a person or company before doing business with them. A litigation flag is one data point among many others it pulls together, alongside credit bureau data, GST and ITR filings, MCA company records, bank statement analysis, and identity documents. The job here is risk screening at volume: hundreds or thousands of names checked through an API, with a yes-or-no or a risk score as the output.

The job Claw does: finding, citing, and managing an actual case

Legal teams have a different problem. A lawyer or in-house counsel does not just need to know that a litigation exists. They need to find the judgment, read what it actually says, cite it correctly in a filing, track the next hearing date, and often manage the matter through to its conclusion. That is legal case search and case management, not a background-verification flag.

02What good looks like, for each job

Since these are two different jobs, the criteria that matter are different too.

For a KYB or background-verification check, look for:

• Bulk and API access: the ability to check hundreds of names programmatically, not one at a time in a browser.
• Breadth of linked data: litigation alongside credit, GST, ITR, and company filings, so a risk decision is not made on one signal alone.
• Speed and entity matching: fast turnaround, and tolerance for spelling variations in names, since manual review of every hit does not scale.
• Compliance fit: whether it plugs into an existing KYC or onboarding workflow.

For legal case search and case work, look for:

• Full-text, citable judgments: not just a flag that a case exists, but the actual judgment text with a verified, court-ready citation.
• All-India court coverage for search: the High Courts and the Supreme Court, across enough years to be useful for research.
• Case tracking and management: hearing dates, cause lists, alerts, and a way to manage a matter over its life, not just a one-time check.
• Built for legal work: drafting support, an AI assistant that understands legal questions, and compliance automation tied to court orders.

A litigation flag in a KYC report and a court-ready citation in a legal filing are built for different readers, and mixing them up is the most common mistake in this comparison.

03Karza (Perfios) and Claw, compared

Here is each platform on its own terms, starting with the one that is genuinely the specialist for its job.

04Side-by-side comparison

To be clear about where each one genuinely leads: Karza (Perfios) wins on bulk, automated screening and on the breadth of non-litigation data it pulls into a single check, which is exactly what BFSI onboarding and risk teams need. Claw wins on depth for actual legal work: citable judgment text, case tracking, and case management, which a KYC data platform does not attempt. Neither claim is a knock on the other tool; they are built for different buyers.

05How to choose

This is less a head-to-head and more a fork in the road, based on the job you actually have.

If you are a bank, NBFC, lender, or onboarding team that needs to run automated, bulk checks on individuals or companies, and litigation history is one signal among credit, GST, and identity data, Karza (Perfios) is built for exactly that. If you are a lawyer, law firm, or corporate legal team that needs to search and cite judgments, track hearings, manage matters, and get AI drafting help, Claw is built for that instead. If your organisation needs both, for example a bank with an in-house legal team, it is common to run a KYB or background-verification platform for onboarding and risk, and a separate legal case-search-and-management platform for the legal department, since neither is a substitute for the other.

To see more options in each category, browse AICA alternatives and Perfios litigation search API alternatives.

06Who should not buy Claw

Being honest about fit cuts both ways. Here is who should pick Karza (Perfios), or another BFSI-grade data platform, over Claw.

• Banks, NBFCs, and lenders running onboarding or credit decisions at volume. If you need to check hundreds or thousands of applicants a day through an API, with litigation as one signal alongside credit bureau data, GST and ITR filings, bank statement analysis, and identity verification, Karza (Perfios) is built for exactly that job. Claw does not pull credit, GST, ITR, or bank-statement data, and is not a bulk KYC/KYB screening engine.
• Compliance and risk teams that need a single automated risk score, not a judgment to read. If the output you need is a yes/no or a score for a lending or vendor-onboarding decision, a data-aggregation platform like Karza (Perfios) does that job more directly than a legal case-search tool.
• Anyone who only needs a one-time litigation flag on a name, not ongoing case tracking, citation, or matter management. Paying for a full legaltech platform to check a single litigation flag is overkill; a per-check background-verification product is the cheaper, more direct fit.
• Teams that need property, vehicle, or other non-legal ownership checks bundled with litigation data. That bundling is part of Karza (Perfios)’s core offering and is outside what Claw does.

If any of this describes your actual need, Karza (Perfios) or a similar BFSI-focused data platform is the better and more honest choice, and buying Claw instead would mean paying for legal depth you will not use while still missing the bulk screening and linked financial data your team actually needs.

07Where Claw fits

Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals.

For litigation and court data specifically, Claw is not trying to be a KYC or KYB data aggregator, and it does not compete with Karza on bulk background-verification checks across credit, GST, and identity data. Claw’s job is the legal work itself: an all-India AI case search over 1.5 billion-plus case records and 30 crore-plus judgements, verified court-ready citations, case tracking across 9,102-plus courts, and an AI legal assistant and compliance automation built for how lawyers and legal teams actually work. If your search for a "Karza litigation check alternative" was really a search for a tool to help your legal team find, cite, track, and manage cases, that is the gap Claw is built to fill. For court-record checks in a background-verification context specifically, see company background verification using court records.

08Sources and further reading

The platforms discussed here, linked to their official sources:

• Perfios (Karza’s current parent brand): perfios.ai
• Perfios Legal Search Report (litigation search product page, source for coverage and pricing claims used here): perfios.ai/legal-search-report
• Karza (legacy domain, now redirects to Perfios): karza.in
• Claw: clawlaw.in
• Claw pricing: clawlaw.in/price
• Ministry of Corporate Affairs (official company filings): mca.gov.in

This is not an exhaustive comparison of every KYB or litigation-data vendor. Coverage and pricing figures for Karza and Perfios are vendor claims as published on their own sites, and Claw pricing is as published on clawlaw.in/price. All figures on this page were last verified on 17 September 2026 and should be reconfirmed directly with each vendor before you rely on them.

09Frequently asked questions