BNS Section 207: Preventing Service of a Summons or Other Proceeding, or Its Publication (IPC 173 Mapping) (2026)

Explainer · Criminal Law · BNS

Updated for 2026 · Claw Editorial

Section 207 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) punishes a person who intentionally prevents the service or publication of a summons, notice or order lawfully issued by a public servant. It is the new home of the offence that lawyers knew as Section 173 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The punishment has two levels, and it rises when a court is involved. If you searched for "BNS Section 207" expecting something else, remember that the BNS renumbered the old code, so the number alone can mislead. This explainer sets out what Section 207 covers, the two punishment levels, how it maps to the old law, and the classification. Last verified October 2026.

01Why the number trips people up

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC) from 1 July 2024 and renumbered almost every offence. So the IPC number you remember rarely points to the same provision in the BNS.

Section 207 is one such case. In the BNS it sits in the chapter on contempts of the lawful authority of public servants. It punishes a person who gets in the way of a summons, notice or order being served or published. Reading the new number correctly matters, because a charge for conduct on or after 1 July 2024 is drawn under the BNS and cites Section 207, not the old IPC number.

02What Section 207 covers

Section 207 of the BNS punishes a person who intentionally does any of these things in relation to a summons, notice or order that a competent public servant has issued:

• prevents the serving of it on himself or on another person;
• prevents the lawful affixing of it to any place;
• removes it from a place where it is lawfully affixed; or
• prevents the lawful making of a proclamation.

The act must be intentional, and the summons, notice, order or proclamation must have been issued or directed by a public servant who is legally competent to do so. The offence protects the basic machinery of courts and public servants: the ability to put people on notice of proceedings.

03Key ingredients

To bring a case under Section 207, the prosecution must show:

• A lawful summons, notice, order or proclamation: issued or directed by a public servant legally competent to issue or direct it;
• One of the listed acts: preventing service, preventing affixing, removing after lawful affixing, or preventing the proclamation;
• Intention: the act was done intentionally.

The punishment depends on what the summons, notice or order required. If it called for attendance in person or by agent, or production of a document or electronic record, in a court, the higher level of punishment applies.

04Old to new: IPC 173 to BNS 207

Section 173 of the IPC is now Section 207 of the BNS. The offence is carried over, with the fine amounts expressed in current figures.

Because the structure is carried forward, older judgments on Section 173 of the IPC continue to guide how Section 207 is read.

05Punishment and classification

Section 207 sets two levels of punishment:

• General case: simple imprisonment for a term up to one month, or a fine up to five thousand rupees, or both.
• Where a court is involved: if the summons, notice or order required attendance in person or by agent, or the production of a document or electronic record, in a court, simple imprisonment up to six months, or a fine up to ten thousand rupees, or both.

On classification, the offence under Section 207 is:

• Non-cognizable: the police generally need the order of a Magistrate to investigate.
• Bailable: bail is a matter of right, subject to conditions.
• Triable by any Magistrate.

06What changed from the old law

For this offence, the change is mostly the number and the updated fine figures, which are now stated as five thousand and ten thousand rupees. The conduct, the two-level structure, and the intention requirement are carried over from Section 173 of the IPC, so the settled case law continues to apply. The reference to a document or electronic record keeps pace with electronic filing.

The practical point is the transition. A charge for conduct on or after 1 July 2024 reads Section 207 of the BNS, while an older matter keeps its IPC 173 tag, because the law that applies is the law on the date of the offence.

07Where Claw fits

Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals.

An offence about a blocked summons or a notice pulled down rarely stands alone; it sits inside a larger matter, so counsel want to see how courts have handled it. Claw reads across more than 30 crore judgments, returning each result in under 5 seconds, and its record runs from the Supreme Court of 1950 and the High Courts of 1990 onward. You can surface the decisions on preventing service, or follow a pending matter through its orders and hearings over the 9,102 courts, benches and forums Claw tracks.

Claw does not use customer case documents to train its AI models. Open a free Claw account to find a Section 207 matter by the party or the advocate named in it, and to watch it as it is listed. To range across the whole body of decided law, see case search across Indian courts.

08Sources and further reading

• India Code (official text of the BNS, 2023): indiacode.nic.in
• PRS Legislative Research (BNS overview and IPC comparison): prsindia.org
• Section 207, BNS (bare text): devgan.in
• Claw: clawlaw.in

This explainer is general information, not legal advice. The law changes through amendments and judgments, so check the current text and take advice from counsel before you act.

09Frequently asked questions