Best Court Data and Case-Tracking APIs in India (2026)
What separates a reliable court data and case-tracking API in India from a risky one, what to evaluate on coverage, forums and update speed, and how the main options compare in 2026.
Buyer’s Guide · Court Data APIs
When an enterprise or a legaltech team needs court data in code, the status of a case, the next hearing, the latest order, pulling it one court website at a time does not scale. A court data or case-tracking API lets that information flow into your own systems automatically, for monitoring a litigation portfolio or screening a party before a decision. This guide explains what to evaluate, coverage, forums, matching and update speed, and compares the main options in India in 2026. We name each option neutrally and say where each one leads.
- Widest coverage, tracking plus research: Claw, covering 9,102 courts, benches and forums for tracking and 30 crore+ judgments for search.
- Most named, transparent coverage: Vakeel360, with specific courts and tribunal benches stated and a published pricing model.
- Broadest bundled KYC suite: Surepass, within a wider verification platform, though pricing is quote-based.
- For eligible public bodies: the official eCourts and NJDG APIs, restricted to government and institutional litigants.
01Why court data by API is hard in India
India has no single national database you can query for every case. Court data is spread across district courts, High Courts and tribunals, each with its own records, and the Supreme Court runs its own system outside the main eCourts set-up. The official NJDG open APIs exist but access is restricted, mainly to government bodies and institutional litigants, so most businesses rely on private providers built on public data.
Three things make this genuinely hard: coverage is uneven across courts and tribunals; matching a case to the right party is difficult because Indian names are spelled inconsistently; and the data has a freshness lag between what happens in court and what an API returns. For the background, see what a court data API is.
02What to evaluate
Five things separate a court data API you can rely on from one that just looks good on a landing page:
- Coverage, stated specifically: which courts, benches and tribunals it covers, by name and number, not just "all courts in India."
- Forums and depth: whether it reaches tribunals and district courts, and whether it also covers judgment search, not just case status.
- Update speed: how current the data is and how the provider sources and refreshes it.
- Matching quality: whether it tolerates spelling variation and helps you confirm a case belongs to your subject.
- Integration and data handling: clean docs, a sandbox, sensible rate limits, and a clear stance on how your data is used.
In court data, the hardest part is not finding a case. It is covering enough courts, keeping the data fresh, and being sure the case belongs to the party you are checking.
03The best court data APIs in India (2026)
The options below are ranked for the court data and case-tracking job specifically: breadth of court coverage, forums reached, update approach and matching quality.
Top pick
Claw
An all-in-one Indian legaltech platform whose case tracking and judgment search reach the widest set of forums.
Strengths
- The broadest stated coverage for tracking: cases, orders and hearings across 9,102 courts, benches and forums, including district courts and tribunals, so a whole portfolio can be followed from one place.
- Judgment search spans 30 crore+ judgments, with Supreme Court decisions from 1950 and High Court decisions from 1990, returning results in under 5 seconds, so the same vendor covers both tracking and research.
- Name-tolerant matching built to handle the spelling variation Indian party names are prone to, and a clear stance that Claw does not use customer case documents to train its AI models.
Keep in mind
- API-specific endpoints, authentication and rate limits should be confirmed with Claw directly before building against them.
- The published Rs 1,099 per month (Premium, excl GST) price is for the case search and management product, not confirmed as the price for API access.
Best for Enterprises and legaltech teams that want the widest court and tribunal coverage for tracking, plus judgment search, from one vendor.
Vakeel360
A developer-focused Indian court case API with specifically named court and tribunal coverage.
Strengths
- States coverage in specific, named terms: named High Courts, a stated count of district courts, and named tribunal benches across NCLT, CAT, ITAT, CESTAT and RERA.
- Publishes its pricing model upfront, fixed monthly plans without per-call charges, rather than a pure contact-sales wall.
- Returns case status, hearing details, orders and cause lists as structured JSON, with API-key authentication and documentation.
Keep in mind
- The exact rupee rate card still depends on your usage tier and needs a conversation.
- Coverage, while named, is narrower than a full pan-India sweep, so confirm your target courts are included.
Best for Developers who want clearly named coverage and a predictable, non-per-call pricing model.
Surepass
A broad KYC and verification API platform whose court case check sits alongside identity checks.
Strengths
- Built for onboarding and screening: banks, NBFCs and employers using it for litigation checks during customer and employee verification.
- Feature set includes bulk search, filters by case type and state, and form-filling to cut manual data-entry errors.
- Sits inside a wider suite of identity and verification APIs, which can simplify integration if you already need other KYC checks.
Keep in mind
- Court coverage is described in general terms rather than a named list, so the exact scope is harder to verify upfront.
- Pricing is not published; you request a key and get a quote from sales.
Best for Teams that want a single KYC and verification provider covering identity checks beyond court records.
04Side-by-side comparison
| Option | Coverage | Forums and depth | Pricing model | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claw | 9,102 courts, benches and forums (tracking); 30 crore+ judgments (search) | District courts, tribunals and judgment search | Platform pricing public; API plan to confirm | Widest coverage, tracking plus research |
| Vakeel360 | Named High Courts, district courts and tribunal benches | Case status, hearings, orders, cause lists | Published: fixed monthly, no per-call charges | Predictable, named coverage |
| Surepass | General terms, not a named list | Court case check within a KYC suite | Not published: contact sales | Bundled KYC and verification needs |
| Official eCourts / NJDG API | District and High Courts (not the Supreme Court) | Case status, cause lists, orders | Restricted to government and institutional litigants | Public bodies and institutional litigants |
05What it costs
Pricing transparency is uneven across this category, which is itself worth knowing before you evaluate.
- Claw: the wider platform has public pricing, Premium at Rs 1,099 per month excluding GST, as listed in October 2026, plus a free plan for individual advocates. This is for the case search and management product; confirm whether API access uses the same plan or a separate one.
- Vakeel360: publishes its pricing model, fixed monthly plans without per-call charges, though the exact rate depends on your usage tier.
- Surepass: no pricing published for the court case check; you request a key and get a quote.
- Official eCourts / NJDG API: not a commercial product; access is restricted to eligible government and institutional users.
06How to choose
Match the option to the job and the certainty you need.
If you need the widest coverage and both tracking and research from one vendor, start with Claw and confirm the API specifics. If you want named coverage and a published, predictable pricing model, Vakeel360 discloses the most about both. If you already run KYC checks for Aadhaar, PAN or GST, a bundled suite like Surepass can simplify integration. If you are an eligible government body or institutional litigant, the official eCourts and NJDG routes are open to you.
Whichever you pick, add a step to confirm a returned case actually belongs to your subject, and for the developer mechanics see how to integrate a case status API and the best litigation check APIs in India.
07Where Claw fits
Claw is an all-in-one legaltech platform for Indian advocates, law firms, and corporate legal teams, combining AI-based case search, an AI legal assistant (Legal GPT), case management, and compliance automation across all Indian courts and tribunals.
For court data specifically, Claw leads this list on breadth. Its case tracking reaches 9,102 courts, benches and forums, including district courts and tribunals, and its judgment search covers 30 crore+ judgments, with Supreme Court decisions from 1950 and High Court decisions from 1990, in under 5 seconds. Name-tolerant matching handles the spelling variation Indian names are prone to, and Claw does not use your case documents to train its AI models. The one thing to confirm directly is the API-specific documentation and pricing.
Create a FREE Claw account to try case search across Indian courts before you commit, then confirm the API details with Claw. For the public records angle, see what a court records API does.
08Sources and further reading
- Claw: clawlaw.in
- Vakeel360: vakeel360.com/api
- Surepass: surepass.io
- eCourts India (official court data portal): ecourts.gov.in
This is not an exhaustive list of providers. Coverage figures and pricing are as published at the time of writing and should be confirmed with each provider before you build against them.
09Frequently asked questions
What is the best court data API in India?
It depends on the job. For the widest court and tribunal coverage plus judgment search from one vendor, Claw leads, covering 9,102 courts, benches and forums for tracking and 30 crore+ judgments for search. For named coverage with a published pricing model, Vakeel360 is strong. For a bundled KYC suite, Surepass fits. Eligible government and institutional litigants can use the official eCourts and NJDG APIs.
Can businesses use the official eCourts or NJDG API?
Generally no. The official NJDG open APIs are restricted mainly to central and state government bodies and institutional litigants with a department identifier and access key. Other businesses use private providers built on public court data.
What should I evaluate in a court data API?
Coverage stated specifically by court and tribunal, the forums and depth it reaches, how current the data is and how it is sourced, matching quality for Indian party names, and the integration experience and data-handling stance.
How current is the data these APIs return?
There is always a lag between what happens in court and what an API returns, since the underlying records update as courts enter data. A good provider is transparent about its source and refresh cadence, so confirm this before relying on a result for a decision.
How much does a court data API cost in India?
It varies and not every provider publishes pricing. Claw has public platform pricing, Premium at Rs 1,099 per month excluding GST as listed in October 2026, though API-specific pricing should be confirmed. Vakeel360 publishes a fixed-monthly model. Surepass is quote-based. The official eCourts and NJDG routes are not commercial products.
Do these APIs cover the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court runs its own case information system outside the main eCourts set-up, so coverage of it varies by provider. Claw’s judgment search includes Supreme Court decisions from 1950. Always confirm Supreme Court coverage separately for the specific job you need.